To Auto Update or not Auto Update - that is the question!
It takes a certain amount of guts (some call it stupidity) to turn the control of your computer to some unnamed entity that wants not only to take over your computer for updates but wants to do it all at a time of his choice and in a manner not controllable by you.
The problem is compounded exponentially if you have more than one computer to administer and your goal in life is not to spend the rest of your life being an administrator.
What are you going to do when you have 2 or 20 to take care of? How about three but you are not familiar with what needs updating on a routine basis?
The answer is to seek out the control section of each of the programs in question and to set the program to automatically update whenever the program feels like it. I always find out the habits of the computer user and set the update time for a time that makes sense for the user - often an hour after the computer is turned on.
And so it is worth it to go to each application program's update section and set the available options appropriately and give away control of the computer to an entity that can administer a specific portion of your computer on your behalf. Only once in years have I ever had a problem that I would not liked to have but, in this case, the correction came though a month later.
And so, yes, I do give up control of my computer to others which frees me to do what I do best - other things associated with my user function on the computer.
So give it up. Find every automatic sequence you can and activate the automatic update wherever you can.
If you are handling computers for others, the decrease in calls or the decreasing amount of time spent with the computer will be worth the investment.
George Sidman discussed his newest business venture, WebLOQ™.
WebLOQ has developed new technologies that deliver ubiquitous and secure privacy over the open Internet, to any Internet user, free of the prior costs and technical constraints of the traditional VPN and stand-alone encryption.
Designed as a simple download, the WebLOQ trust solution will run on any PC, laptop, PDA or cell phone. All elements that achieve this new paradigm for privacy - such as strong encryption and isolation from malware - operate within truly private communities, completely transparent to the user, and independent of the method of Internet connectivity.
WebLOQ is completely agnostic to the transport layer or the service provider. A WebLOQ subscriber can roam freely and connect securely anywhere - through both wireline and wireless connections - with no changes to device configurations.
Private communities are established in front of, or behind, corporate firewalls, and host any number of private email accounts. Communities may be federated to achieve cross-chain sub-communities, which are granular to the individual email address. Such private communities have only been possible before behind the corporate firewall. Until now, achieving privacy has required the expense and challenges of a VPN installation - a job only pricey IT expertise could manage - and limited to only single point connectivity.
WebLOQ resides behind standard desktop applications, and once installed, operates with no further user manipulation.
WebLOQ sorts out standard .com email from the WebLOQ private email traffic, sending each on its way with no special action from the sender. Email messages, attachments - and even the private email addresses - are encrypted, assuring that they cannot be harvested from the open Internet. The private WebLOQ email address is uniquely configured so that it will not even route over the open Internet. It can be openly disclosed to anyone, but can only be used within your private community.
Since your private email address cannot be harvested, you are protected from malware within your private community.
WebLOQ accounts and private communities and are available directly - and very economically - from the WebLOQ web site. Enterprise solutions are also available for larger organizations that prefer to host WebLOQ privacy on their own servers.
WebLOQ is the first to offer an easily implemented, inexpensive and legally compliant privacy solution - while locking out malware and securing any device, on any connection anywhere - in a manner readily beneficial to any level of user.
WebLOQ desktop and server solutions are Java based and operate on all popular operating systems and platforms. Standard SQL databases and the Objectivity very large scale object database are supported.
Address: WebLOQ, Inc., 484-B Washington St. #170, Monterey, CA 93940; Phone: (831) 771-0142 Website: www. Webloq.com
None of us has the time to exhaustively investigate the relative merits of competing software, so we rely on reports like those in the following links to at least give some feel for the good and bad points of each program or service.
Having gone through literally hundreds of computers, I have pretty much settled on Trend Micro's PC-cillin™ Internet Security 2006 and indeed, usually attempt to keep a small stock on hand so that as I need licenses for the Clinic, we don't have to fool with a trip to the store. I have gone thorough 15 so far.
Further, I have found that the Symantec products cause weird problems that eventually cause me to remove the product and replace it with Trend Micro.
Further, Trend Micro provides an effective firewall, but doesn't tell the user anything about what it is doing - it just does it. When installing the package onto a computer of a user that is not into all of the administration, this is a great advantage.
Attempting to explain to a newbie about all of the decisions that have to be evaluated when using Zone Alarm, even I, who am in the business, do not know some of the answers unless I take the time to go out on the net to evaluate the Zone Alarm popups. The Trend Micro people have huge database of programs to be automatically accepted and programs to be automatically rejected and only a very few that require any user input. This is a great advantage, as it allows users to act as users, not as System Administrators.
The C|Net review of the speed degradation of various anti-virus products
The C|Net opinion on PCcillin 2006
![]()